Sat, Feb 29, 2020
09:00 PM
FinalRegular season
Amalie Arena
Retroactive prediction
Correct winner predicted
CGY 38%62% TBL
Probable score
2 - 2
Regulation win (home)
46%
OT / shootout probability
21%
Elo home / away
1601 / 1508
Likely goal scorers
3/6 correct0.20 goal · 18%0
0.16 goal · 15%1
0.16 goal · 15%1
0.16 goal · 15%0
0.15 goal · 14%0
0.14 goal · 13%1
Likely goal scorers
3/6 correct0.20 goal · 18%0
0.16 goal · 15%1
0.16 goal · 15%1
0.16 goal · 15%0
0.15 goal · 14%0
0.14 goal · 13%1
Likely assists
4/6 correct0.28 assist · 25%2
0.25 assist · 22%0
0.22 assist · 20%0
0.21 assist · 19%1
0.18 assist · 16%1
0.16 assist · 15%1
Likely point getters
4/6 correct0.48 point · 38%2
0.37 point · 31%0
0.32 point · 27%1
0.32 point · 27%1
0.29 point · 26%0
0.29 point · 25%1
Tonight's matchup
| CGY | Stat | TBL |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | G | 33 |
| 38 | A | 52 |
| 61 | PTS | 85 |
| 12.2% | S% | 15.7% |
| 18.3 | TOI | 18.9 |
CGY 1 – 3 TBL · goal diff (home) 0.75
Result
Three stars
Scoring summary
1st period
- 13:52
M. Sergachev (22), N. Kucherov (48)
CGY 0–1 TBL
2nd period
- 07:05
N. Kucherov (49), M. Sergachev (23)
CGY 0–2 TBL - 11:50
C. Paquette (11), Z. Bogosian (5)
CGY 0–3 TBL - 13:12
M. Backlund (27)
CGY 1–3 TBL - 14:04
E. Gustafsson (22), J. Gaudreau (38)
CGY 2–3 TBL - 14:57
B. Coleman (11), B. Coburn (2)
CGY 2–4 TBL
3rd period
- 17:11
E. Lindholm (24), M. Tkachuk (35)
CGY 3–4 TBL
Team comparison
| CGY | Stat | TBL |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Shots | 33 |
| 1 | Power play | 2 |
| 19 | Hits | 24 |
| 11 | Blocked shots | 17 |
| 10 | PIM | 6 |
