Sat, Oct 16, 2021
02:00 AM
FinalRegular season
Rogers Place
Retroactive prediction
Correct winner predicted
CGY 47%53% EDM
Probable score
1 - 1
Regulation win (home)
37%
OT / shootout probability
25%
Elo home / away
1510 / 1497
Likely goal scorers
2/6 correct0.14 goal · 13%1
0.11 goal · 10%0
0.11 goal · 10%1
0.10 goal · 9%0
0.07 goal · 7%0
0.04 goal · 4%0
Likely goal scorers
2/6 correct0.14 goal · 13%1
0.11 goal · 10%0
0.11 goal · 10%1
0.10 goal · 9%0
0.07 goal · 7%0
0.04 goal · 4%0
Likely assists
1/6 correct0.18 assist · 17%0
0.13 assist · 12%1
0.10 assist · 9%0
0.09 assist · 8%0
0.08 assist · 8%0
0.07 assist · 7%0
Likely point getters
3/6 correct0.28 point · 24%0
0.24 point · 21%1
0.22 point · 20%1
0.17 point · 16%1
0.14 point · 13%0
0.13 point · 12%0
Tonight's matchup
| CGY | Stat | EDM |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | G | 44 |
| 75 | A | 79 |
| 115 | PTS | 123 |
| 15.3% | S% | 14.0% |
| 18.6 | TOI | 22.1 |
Result
Three stars
Scoring summary
1st period
- 13:08EDMD. Ryan(1)
W. Foegele (1), Z. Kassian (1)
CGY 0–1 EDM - 17:29
J. Puljujarvi (1), L. Draisaitl (2)
CGY 0–2 EDM
2nd period
- 05:33
D. Nurse (2), R. Nugent-Hopkins (1)
CGY 0–3 EDM - 09:19
D. Dube (1), J. Välimäki (1)
CGY 1–3 EDM
3rd period
- 05:03
M. Tkachuk (1), R. Andersson (1)
CGY 2–3 EDM - 05:29
C. Ceci (1), L. Draisaitl (3)
CGY 2–4 EDM - 18:23
J. Puljujarvi (2), L. Draisaitl (4)
CGY 2–5 EDM
Team comparison
| CGY | Stat | EDM |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | Shots | 33 |
| 1 | Power play | 2 |
| 27 | Hits | 26 |
| 6 | Blocked shots | 13 |
| 10 | PIM | 12 |
